Stories built upon half-truths or
outright lies are storming the United States by force. Angry people on all
sides are making claims against several issues including health care, taxes,
immigration, or foreign policies (to name a few).
While it is interesting to watch as
these issues are picked apart by the media and the American people, it is not
surprising to watch as the Internet trolls load up on their “fake news”
ammunition and petty insults to distract and redirect the average reader’s
attention.
There are endless examples of this
behavior throughout the Internet, and it is not limited to one side of an
argument. In many political articles, the comments are riddled with attacks on
the writer’s character or snips about another commenter’s mother. And people
with completely different world views, who align themselves with opposing
political parties, are all guilty of attacking their opponent’s character or
turning insults back onto their foes.
There seems to be a distinct attitude
within the comments of an article, and it can be very off putting for many
readers when these waves of hostility take over a place meant for discussion.
While it can be amusing on a surface
level to watch a bunch of volatile schmucks insult each other left and right, it
is obvious that there is no room for an actual discussion to grow. The comments
can quickly become a place where individuals with real concerns are afraid to
speak up because they do not wish to be publicly ridiculed.
Watching these verbally abusive brawls
unfold is rapidly becoming an everyday norm. But was this always the outcome of
online conversations? Were the actual concerns and issues that most citizens
without a voice in America could be drowned out and overshadowed by the
reckless and problematic arguments of the radical few?
Well, yeah. Of course! Negative seems
to strongly outweigh the positive when it comes to human nature.
Within the last week, the Republican
party has been pushing to pass their health bill in order to repeal and replace
the American Care Act (ACA) put into play during Barak Obama’s presidency.
Now, should one take a moment to peruse
the comment sections of most news sites that report on breaking news, such as
USAToday, The Washington Times, The Guardian, The Hill, or Fox News, a clearer
story can be sorted out.
Nearly every comment section has been
over-run by hostile and ugly insults or hate speech.
Below are a few gems that I found in, "Trump Blames the Democrats for GOP Health Care Bill Failure, Says ObamaCare is 'Imploding'," which focuses on the more recent topic of the GOP’s health care bill.
These insults against people’s
character and criticism against issues that are not dire or even being argued
tell a troubling story. Many people do not want to hear what they do not agree
with, and they are willing to insult their enemies (ad hominem) and turn ugly
comments thrown their way back onto their opponents (tu quoque.) This is not
the way respectable people should act.
And now, those who speak up in this era
are labeled as “easily offended” or “weak.”
“‘Poor Little Snowflake’ – the Defining Insult of 2016,” published by The Guardian, sums up the dynamic of people who
resort to insulting and blaming others who do not share their views. This
article looks at the term “snowflake,” which has been thrown around left and
right since the beginning of the US election, and focuses on how it has been
used as an insult.
Basically, anyone who disagrees with an
argument, or asks that offensive topics and reasoning be questioned and
rebuked, are deemed “thin-skinned and weak minded.”
The author of this article, Rebecca
Nicholson, writes:
So if the right are calling the left snowflakes for being
liberal, and the left are calling the right snowflakes for expressing offence,
and the old are calling the young snowflakes for being too thin-skinned, and
the young are pointing out that the older generation seem to be the most
offended by what they’re doing, then the only winner is the phrase itself.
Her words tell a story that there is no
sure way to win these arguments, but her observations should serve as a wake-up
call. Do not take the comments personally. Instead, participate in local
politics, keep yourself updated on breaking news from multiple websites – even
websites with views that do not share your exact values – and do not let the
comments get you down.
Staying well informed is a great way to
stand above the rioting crowds, and it is also a great contribution to the
cleanup of the Internet comment sections. If there are not enough rude and
angry people in the comments, the discussions will eventually die out.
Keep on keeping on and please, don’t
feed the trolls.
This is an example of how a great blog title that's catchy and relevant can really draw readers into a text. I took one look at this and laughed. Then I wanted to read more.
ReplyDeleteRight before you get to the "takedown" of the comments section on the GOP ACHA bill (or "Trumpcare"), can you share where the article was posted? I think that might really clarify the volume and vitriol or the comments in that comment section.
You make thoughtful arguments about people who attack each other (and the motivations for doing so) online. Take a look at this Guardian article that attempts to unmask the Internet Troll: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/10/truth-trolls-internet-abusive-comments-online
Emma,
ReplyDeleteFirst off I would like to commend you on your good use of a witty title. Secondly, I think you bring up a really good point about the logical fallacies in people's arguments inside comment sections. In my personal experience, the most common one I've seen is the ad hominem logical fallacy, where most users will just attack each other to try and discredit their argument. The one problem I am having with your post is that the link to the article above your comment screenshots is not working for me. Overall good job on your article and I look forward to your future articles.