Written By: Melina A. Gray
In the article
written by Terence McCoy, “For the ‘New Yellow Journalists,’ Opportunity Comes
in Clicks and Bucks,” two young men, Wade and Goldman, put into perspective
what Yellow Journalism is. The two young authors say that their mission with
their blog is to get rid of bias. However, reading through the article,
everything Wade and Goldman write seems to have some form of bias entwined in
it.[1]
This idea of “Fake
News” is not a new one. For many years’ writers, reporters, paparazzi, etc.,
have been creating fake stories and selling it to anyone who will listen. According
to Courtney DuChene in “Is Fake News the 2016 Version of Yellow Journalism,”
the talk about “fake news” flared back up during the 2016 election cycle.[2]
President Donald Trump recently made a statement about the topic during one of his
press conferences saying, “The press has become so dishonest that if we don't talk about
it, we are doing a tremendous disservice to the American people…The level of
dishonesty is out of control.”[3]
When a world leader criticizes the press as consistently as Trump does, the public will do either one of two things: start questioning everything the press says until that leader validates it, to start calling the leader out and questioning that individual. This more than likely makes even real news, look fake and unreliable to the public.
So now that “Fake News” is being brought to
the light, what exactly is it? Why are people creating/spreading it? What is
their motivation? And why are we listening to it and believing it?
According to BBC in their article, “Fake news:
What is it? And how to spot it,” “Fake news is news or stories
on the internet that are not true.” The question that probably
arises in your head is, “How can we stop the spread of fake news?” Well. The
answer is, you need to ask yourself these questions before you hit the “share”
button or make your mind up that it is true.[4]
Now that we know what fake
news is, we can answer the next questions. Why are people spreading it? What is
their motivation? And what should happen when someone says that a news story is fake, but it really isn't?
Going off everything I have researched; I’ve concluded
that a yellow journalists’ motivation is to attract readers and gain popularity
by telling the audience what they want to hear. Yellow Journalists’ want attention,
and ultimately money, and they have created a way to get that without having to
work too hard for it.
When someone gives a fake cry of fake news, the reader or listener should verify for themselves that it is fake by doing research of their own online and making sure their research and sources are credible. As for why the people are believing and
listening to news that is not reliable, I believe that it is because we are
biased. We listen to and believe what we want. It doesn’t have to be true,
because at the end of the day, it is what we want to hear. This does not go for
everybody though. There are some people that want to get to the truth and
eliminate the lies, and I commend those people.
In the article written by Terence McCoy, “For the ‘New Yellow Journalists,’ Opportunity Comes in Clicks and Bucks,” two young men, Wade and Goldman, put into perspective what Yellow Journalism is. The two young authors say that their mission with their blog is to get rid of bias. However, reading through the article, everything Wade and Goldman write seems to have some form of bias entwined in it.[1]
When a world leader criticizes the press as consistently as Trump does, the public will do either one of two things: start questioning everything the press says until that leader validates it, to start calling the leader out and questioning that individual. This more than likely makes even real news, look fake and unreliable to the public.
Hey Melina,
ReplyDeleteI really like how you backed up your reasoning in the beginning of the blog. It is obvious that you put in a lot of research into this before you came to your conclusion about yellow journalism. I totally agree with you on your reasoning behind why people believe it. Nice Job!!
Melina,
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting post, and I like that you layered this with a mention of President Trump. He's right, in a sense--yes, there is fake news that can be found on the Internet, especially. But in his case, isn't the issue that he calls "fake news" any news that disagrees with him? That takes this discussion in an entirely new but interesting direction. What happens when a world leader pans the press as consistently as he does? Since all news, of course, isn't fake, what does this do to the image of the news in general? How does one combat a fake cry of "fake news"?